|
A Day In The Life of Baywatch®By *William E. Maguire, Esq. Copyright © 1995 William E. Maguire. All Rights Reserved. BAYWATCH® is a trademark and service mark of The BAYWATCH Production Company and is used here with permission. (as published in Remarks: Trademark News for Business, Vol. 8, No. 2, A Publication of the International Trademark Association)  INTRODUCTION
BAYWATCH
the first run syndicated television series, has become what has been referred
to as, "The Most Popular Television Series In the World." In the
U.S., BAYWATCH consistently ranks in
the top ten in the weekly Neilsen ratings among other syndicated programs.
In many other countries, however, including but not limited to, England,
Spain, Germany, Australia, and New Zealand, BAYWATCH is an entertainment phenomenon. This popularity has led
to obvious ancillary marketing and merchandising potential. With the hiring
of a top licensing agency recently, the offers and licenses have quadrupled
almost overnight. This in turn necessitates proper trademark and licensing
requirements and precautions.
This article will highlight some of the issues which are dealt with on a
day by day basis in the prosecution, registration and defense of theBAYWATCH trademarks worldwide. 8:00 a.m. P.S.T.
The morning begins with a phone call from our London counsel with news of
an advertisement by a major European brewery which has used both the BAYWATCH trademark and the likeness or resemblance of one of the
series' female cast members. The advertisement is not authorized by the
client nor has the actress consented to the appropriation of her likeness.
The matter is resolved with written undertakings or assurances given by
both the U.K. licensee for the brewery and the U.K. advertising agency which
created the advertisement.
9:15 a.m. P.S.T.
The studio faxes a copy of a publication page from the Australian Trade
Mark Official Gazette forwarded to the client by an enterprising Australian
lawyer and prior to receipt of the client's watch notice re same. A "watch
notice" can be purchased from one of several commercial trademark service
firms to keep track of and provide notice in advance of identical or closely
similar marks filed both in the United States and/or other countries. A
previously unknown company (hereinafter, "third party") in Australia
has applied for BAYWATCH in International
Class 25 for clothing. The client's foreign distributor is contacted and
advises us that the third party applicant is not licensed or authorized.
A use investigation is ordered, followed by the filing of an Opposition.
Negotiations with counsel for the third party proceed.
11:00 a.m. P.S.T.
The day's mail includes "watch notice" correspondence which indicates
a third party has applied for BAYWATCH
in International Class 41 in Colombia. The foreign distributor indicates
that the applicant is, in fact, the authorized foreign broadcast licensee
for BAYWATCH in Colombia. After several
unsuccessful attempts to reach the broadcast licensee and with the procedural
Opposition deadline rapidly approaching, the decision is made to contact
our local Colombian trademark attorney. After a flurry of correspondence
from both our local counsel in Colombia and the foreign distributor to the
Colombian broadcast licensee, the licensee agrees to assign or transfer
its application to the client. A Power of Attorney is legalized or authenticated
(e.g., official government fees, seal and/or stamp obtained) and forwarded
to the local associate and the matter is resolved.
12:00 p.m. P.S.T.
A domestic (U.S.) on-line trademark search of the mark, BAYWATCH, reveals a new third party application for the identical
mark in International Class 3 for cosmetics, namely, sunblock lotion, hair
lotion, namely shampoo and conditioner. A phone call to the client's licensing
agency reveals that the applicant is not licensed or otherwise authorized.
A cease and desist letter is prepared, including a sample express abandonment
letter to be signed by the applicant and to be filed with the Assistant
Commissioner for Trademarks. The cease and desist letter is sent to the
applicant advising him that his application has been applied for fraudulently
and that any use by him of the mark BAYWATCH
is likely to cause confusion with the client's exclusive rights to this
same mark. The applicant replies that he will agree to abandon his application
and provides confirmation of his filing same with the Trademark Office.
1:00 p.m. P.S.T.
A facsimile arrives from the client's licensing agent with the updated Licensee
List. The Licensee List reveals several classes of goods not previously
included in trademark applications filed in several foreign jurisdictions.
The client is informed that several more trademark applications must be
filed to support new licensees. The business issue as to whether the license
will pay for the cost of the trademark application(s) and its defense is
discussed. The necessity for supporting the licensees with trademark applications
is recognized as the client's obligation and this reality wins out over
the alternative of not investing in trademark coverage.
2:00 p.m. P.S.T.
MATTEL INC.,
a major BAYWATCH toy licensee, including
but not limited to, BAYWATCH BARBIE®, action figures, dolls and accessories, forwards correspondence
objecting to the length of the trademark and copyright notice (e.g., BAYWATCH is a trademark and © 1994 The BAYWATCH Production Company. All Rights Reserved. BARBIE®
is a registered trademark of Mattel, Inc.) previously forwarded by the client's
licensing agency. The issue is discussed on the phone and an abbreviated
copyright and trademark notice is agreed upon for packaging and on product.
2:30 p.m. P.S.T.
The afternoon mail includes correspondence from the client's in-house counsel
who on a recent trip to Florida has seen a restaurant called 3:00 p.m. P.S.T.
The studio forwards by facsimile a
copy of a postcard from Italy aparently sent by several fans of one of the
series' lead male actors. The postcard is a photograph of five of the series'
male and female stars. The postcard also uses the client's trademark, BAYWATCH. The only clue to the source of the postcard is the name
of an unknown company perhaps in the Italian television industry. A call
to the licensing agent and the foreign distributor reveals that the postcard
is not authorized. Italian counsel is contacted and the price to conduct
an investigation at the local associate's hourly rate is determined to be
too high, together with the local associate's minimal prior experience with
this client. The decision is made to use the German foreign distributor
which has an Italian subsidiary. A color photocopy is forwarded to the Italian
subsidiary and within a week it is determined that the postcard was a promotion in a local Italian television industry magazine. Result: the client's licensee is not threatened, the infringement has ceased and the magazine publisher has indicated no further duplicate or distribution will occur.
4:00 p.m. P.S.T.
A Worldwide Trademark Report of the mark BAYWATCH
is analyzed and several new third party trademark applications in foreign
jurisdictions are revealed. Venezuelan local counsel is contacted and a
preliminary investigation is conducted as to the third party applications.
The foreign distributor confirms that the third parties are not authorized.
Oppositions are authorized to be filed and are pending.
5:00 p.m. P.S.T.
A Letter of Protest After Publication is prepared and filing instructions
given to a local associate in Washington, D.C. for the filing of said Letter
of Protest against an identical mark for (marine) batteries and for retail
services for same. In the United States, a "Letter of Protest"
can be filed with the Assistant Commissioner for Trademarks prior to and
shortly after publication of a third party trademark application. Typically,
the basis for such a Letter of Protest is likelihood of confusion with a
prior registration or prior application. A "cease and desist"
letter is already in the mail with a substantive response promised from
counsel for the applicant. A settlement is reached with the applicant agreeing
to withdraw both of its applications and to discontinue all sales.
CONCLUSION: BAYWATCH®, just as any other successful entertainment property, must establish and defend its trademark rights throughout the world in order to support its licensees and to protect its proprietary interests against counterfeiters and infringers. Communication with the client, foreign associates, the licensing agent, distributors and litigation counsel is an absolute necessity. Diligence in the maintenance of a calendar for pending matters, attention to detail, and management of foreign associates and local counsel is also a priority. The establishment of a network of trusted and experienced foreign counsel will save the client time and money, in addition to reducing the stress otherwise incurred by lead trademark counsel in the management of a worldwide trademark and licensing program. While not intended to be all-inclusive, this article has attempted to outline some of the typical issues and the daily realities associated with a world famous entertainment property such as BAYWATCH®. *William E. Maguire first began working on BAYWATCH in 1988 and has represented The BAYWATCH Production Company with respect to its trademark, copyright and licensing matters since 1991. He is currently in private practice in the Westwood area of Los Angeles. He has been a member of the California bar since 1981, has an LL.M. degree in Intellectual Property, and was previously Senior Counsel for Malibu Comics Entertainment, Inc., a subsidiary of Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc.
11500 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 400, Los Angeles, California 90064-1525 (310) 470-2929 Contact Us TrademarkEsq |